Public Policy & Advocacy
Grantmakers in the Arts holds public policy and advocacy as one of its core funding focus areas and believes one of the most important roles we can serve in benefitting our members and the arts grantmaking community – maximizing the impact our sector can have toward increasing access to the arts and realizing racial justice through the arts – comes by way of our public policy and advocacy work. In GIA’s vision for the future, foundations have shifted their foci to increasingly include advocacy and public sector policy and practice.
Grantmakers in the Arts’ Public Policy & Advocacy work has 3 components:
1. GIA educates funders about how they can advocate and support both advocacy and lobbying.
2. GIA advocates and lobbies for federal governmental policies that benefit artists and other workers as well as students, seniors, children and caregivers.
3. Knowing that much government change happens at the level of agency practice, GIA learns from and provides professional development to public agencies that support the arts and artists at the state and local levels, including through the new GIA Public Sector & Cultural Policy Committee.
FUNDER EDUCATION
GIA educates funders about how they can advocate and support both advocacy and lobbying. Foundations, nonprofit organizations and public agencies can advocate. Advocacy is focused exclusively on raising awareness of issues and the impacts of approaches. Lobbying seeks more targeted influence.
Grassroots lobbying is the action of informing the public about an issue and asking them to take direct action, vote for a certain bill, for instance. Direct lobbying is the action of speaking to a government official with an express ask to take direct action such as voting for a certain bill.
The difference between advocating and lobbying can be identified by asking, “Is there a discrete piece of legislation under discussion? Am I encouraging someone to vote for or against that legislation?” If the answer is no, then you are advocating. If the answer is yes, you are lobbying.
Far more of us can engage in or support lobbying than we often realize. Nonprofits can lobby and foundations can support lobbying.
- Foundations themselves CANNOT lobby, with the exception of community foundations. But, foundations CAN support lobbying.
- Foundations CAN support nonprofits’ lobbying through general operating support as long as none of their funds are earmarked for lobbying.
- Foundations CAN support nonprofits’ lobbying through project grants for projects that include lobbying as long as none of the grant is earmarked for lobbying.
- Foundations CANNOT say, “Here’s your lobbying money.” Foundations CAN say, “Here’s your grant and we recognize that some of it will be used for lobbying.”
ADVOCACY AND LOBBYING
GIA advocates and lobbies for economic justice for workers, including artists. GIA advocates for a guaranteed income. Guaranteed income has its roots in the racial and gender justice movements of the 1960s when both Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party advocated for the policy. GIA advocates for portable benefits for workers. Benefits tied to employment is a historic relic meant to prevent people of color from accessing health insurance and other benefits. This relic discourages entrepreneurship and risk-taking, and has racialized outcomes. GIA has released a call for our stakeholders to endorse the Portable Benefits for Independent Workers Pilot Program Act.
In our support of equity, GIA is race-explicit but not race-exclusive. GIA advocates for cultural and economic self-determination for people with disabilities especially in light of intersecting forms of oppression for racialized people with disabilities. GIA advocates for changing public policies to allow people with disabilities, including artists, to secure greater resources for their work without being rendered ineligible for public supports. GIA is endorsing the Allowing Steady Savings by Eliminating Tests Act (the ASSET Act). The bill raises the limits on assets people with disabilities can hold before being disqualified from public benefits while also indexing those limits to inflation. The bill also prohibits states from using asset tests for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance program (SNAP), and Low Income Home Energy Assistance (LIHEAP).
As part of our support for cultural and economic self-determination, GIA advocates for the solidarity economy. GIA has advocated for all members of Congress to support the National Worker Cooperative Development and Support Act (HR 7221), which aims to promote and expand worker-owned cooperative businesses in the United States by endowing the Small Business Administration, Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, Department of Commerce, United States Department of Agriculture, and Department of Labor with responsibilities and authorities to implement programs and initiatives to support worker co-ops. Individuals and nonprofits can endorse here. Here is more information on the bill. Support to artists working as part of solidarity economies has risen from 7% of GIA’s member survey respondents in 2022 to 13% in 2023 – almost twice as many. Support to organizations working as part of solidarity economies has gone from 0 survey respondents in 2022 to 13% in 2023.
GIA has successfully lobbied to include arts-related provisions in the Child Care for Working Families Act, which proposes to better help low-income families pay for childcare and expand high-quality state preschool options. GIA advocated for AmeriCorps to make national volunteer service more accessible by offering an increase in living allowances.
GIA lobbies for policies that strengthen the nonprofit cultural sector and the public education system, which employ artists while benefiting society as a whole. GIA are committed to invigorating funding and support for arts education within federal policy, and defend that every resident has access to the arts as part of well-rounded, life-long education. Over the past several years, GIA has worked to raise the visibility of the arts in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), provisions we helped integrate into the legislation. Thanks to ESSA, GIA guides our members and their grantees in advocating for new or expanded arts programs at their local schools and districts.
Organized since 2012, GIA’s Arts Education Funders Coalition (AEFC) has worked to address identified needs in comprehensive arts education and to strengthen communication and networking among arts education funders. The AEFC includes members from Americans for the Arts, Arts Education Partnership, Center for Cultural Innovation, The George Gund Foundation, The Heinz Endowments, The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation, and Wallace Foundation, among others. Advised by a committee of Coalition members, GIA engages the services of Washington, D.C.-based Penn Hill Group, a firm with education and labor policy expertise and experience working with diverse education groups to research, develop, and promote educational and labor policy strategies.
Most recently, GIA worked with Representative Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) on the development of the Arts Education for All Act, the broadest arts education policy bill ever introduced in Congress. In Spring 2021, GIA influenced the U.S. Department of Education to highlight the importance of equitable access to arts and culture when determining how to reopen schools. Additionally, GIA emphasized the need to make explicit how this access was racialized prior to the pandemic. Addressing this inequity was essential to effective reopening and remains essential to the adequate provision of comprehensive, well-rounded education. GIA advocates and lobbies for lifelong learning. GIA is delighted that, in 2020, Congress passed the Supporting Older Americans Act including our recommendations that the Administration on Aging include the arts in the issues to be identified and addressed and be included among supportive services for older Americans.
STATE AND LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCIES
In 2025, GIA is piloting the GIA Public Sector & Cultural Policy Committee. The committee will be an incubator for state and local funder organizing and cultural advocacy, cross-sector collaboration, and intersectional equity toward economic justice and is the newest addition to GIA’s commitment to public policy & advocacy. The committee will advise, inspire, and inform GIA’s thought leadership and programming in support of more equitable cultural funding and public policy. You may find more information HERE.
This committee follows GIA’s first public policy track at our 2024 conference and the Cultural Policy Learning Series & Action Lab, a leadership and professional development community of practice program for public sector workers who seek to advance intersectional equity through arts and culture and public policy. These are all steps toward realizing the recommendations in the GIA-commissioned report, Opportunities at the Intersections: Advancing Racial Equity via Arts and Culture in the Public Sector, written by Jen Cole and Rebecca Kinslow.
GIA is eager to continue informing the field’s support for advocacy and to advocate for public policies that enhance lifelong access to the transformative power of arts and culture and create economic justice for artists and other workers.
A few years ago, Laura Penn, managing director of Intiman Theatre in Seattle, met me for coffee at the Saint Francis Hotel. I was between sessions of the Independent Sector's (IS) national conference in San Francisco. Laura had never heard of IS and was curious about it. The Independent Sector is a coalition of corporations, foundations, and private voluntary organizations that works to strengthen nonprofit organizations and is committed to advancing the common good in the U.S.
Read More...It is very unusual for any urban renewal plan not to include reference to the role that arts organizations and arts buildings can potentially play in regeneration. Most recently, in Hurricane Katrina's wake, both have figured prominently in discussions about the future of New Orleans and Biloxi. But the discussions about arts organizations and those about arts buildings are curiously and uncomfortably divorced.
Read More...We live in a world of "widespread hostility toward the United States and its policies."1 This antipathy is not limited to the countries and peoples that are directly affected by the U.S. "war on terror" and its attendant pol-icies, but includes many of our former allies and fellow democracies. A friend who just returned from a year in Spain reports that she spent a significant amount of time and energy convincing people she met there that the U.S.
Read More...Artists and arts institutions rely on the free flow of information to create and distribute their work. The converging digital environment presents many new options for the delivery of specialized information to targeted audiences, and the cultural community is becoming increasingly sophisticated in deploying these tools. However, the United States is only sixteenth in the world in broadband Internet penetration, and the growing digital divide presents a challenge to the vision of ubiquitous access to high-quality images, sound, and text.
Read More...This time it was the catastrophic devastation in the Gulf States. Last time it was the 9/11 attack. Before that were the floods in North Dakota, the earthquakes in San Francisco and Seattle, and Hurricane Hugo in South Carolina, and then
Each time disaster strikes — whether natural or man made — communities face inestimable emotional and economic suffering. When artists, arts organizations, and cultural institutions are affected by these disasters, the confusion and bewilderment about what to do and how to help extends very directly to us as arts grantmakers.
Read More...Under Marian Godfrey's direction, GIA held a pre-conference immediately before its 2005 conference called "New Directions in Cultural Policy Research." As part of that meeting, four well-respected individuals were asked to assess the impact and importance of research in the arts. They were asked to specify the big ideas currently in play and to speculate about the future of those ideas. Predictably perhaps, the four argued for the importance of research to the cultural sector. More surprisingly, they agreed that the platform for cultural research needs serious re-planking.
Read More...Lawrence Lessig sees Big Media waging war against culture in America. And he, for one, is fighting the battle. A professor at Stanford Law School, Lessig achieved notoriety when he represented web site operator Eric Eldred in the ground-breaking case Eldred v. Ashcroft, a challenge to the 1998 Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act. Eric Eldred was a man who wanted to build a library of derivative versions of public domain books (e.g., Hawthorne's A Scarlet Letter) and make them available for free on the Internet.
Read More...2005, 48 pages. Published by American Public Media, 45 East 7th Street, Saint Paul, MN, 55101, 651-290-1225, www.classicalmusicinitiative.org
The second in a series of Working Papers, this report contains ideas and tips for partnering with local public radio stations and national distributors, information on funding resources, rights and clearances, Web initiatives, and audience research.
Read More...2004, 58 pages. Free Expression Policy Project, Brennan Center for Justice, NYU School of Law, 161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th floor, New York, NY, 10013, 212-998-6730, http://www.fepproject.org
Download pdf: http://www.fepproject.org/policyreports/InformationCommons.pdf
Read More...The full text of this article is not yet available on this site. Below is a brief excerpt.
Read More...